|
|
Intelligent
Design network, inc. & the
New Mexico Division of Intelligent
Design network present:
Darwin,
Design and Democracy V:
Science
Converges on Design - from
Cosmology to Paleontology to Biology
S
Y M P O S I U M P R O
G R A M
Friday
& Saturday • September 24-25, 2004
Woodward
Hall, University of New Mexico • Albuquerque,
New Mexico
(Click
Here for Map & Directions)
| Friday
Evening, September 24, 2004 6:30
pm
Registration - Woodward Hall
7:00
- 7:10 pm
Welcome and Introductions
Jack
Cashill, PhD |
Each
event consists
of a 45 minute
presentation and
15 minutes of Q&A. |
|
|
7:10 - 8:10 pm New Mexico Premier Showing
of the Movie:
The
Privileged Planet: How our place in the Cosmos is designed
for discovery
8:10 - 9:30
pm
Cosmology
Converges on Design
Guillermo
Gonzalez, PhD and Jay
Richards, PhD
Saturday,
September 25, 2004
7:30 - 8:00
am
Registration - Woodward
Hall
8:00 - 9:00
am
From
goo to you via the zoo - why origin of life analyses
converge on design
William
S. Harris, PhD
9:05 - 10:05
Convergence
and Common Descent.
Paul
Nelson, PhD
10:15 -
11:15
A
new curriculum module for the Cambrian
Explosion
Michael
Keas, PhD
11:30 First
Concurrent Sessions - see below for topics, locations and speakers
Classrooms
on the second floor of the Student Union Building
12:30 pm Have
a box Lunch With the Speakers. Each
of the speakers will be having a box lunch
in a class room where you can meet them one-on-one
and join them for lunch. Purchase a box
lunch with an advance registration. Lunch
will also be available in the Cafeteria at
the Student Union
1:30 Second
Concurrent Sessions - see below for topics, locations
and speakers
Classrooms
on the second floor of the Student Union Building
2:45
- 3:45
"Convergent
Evolution" - An oxymoron?
Fazale
Rana, PhD
3:50
- 4:50
Why it
is legal to teach the controversy: David
DeWolf, J.D.
Why
it is illegal to suppress it: John
Calvert, J.D.
4:50
- 5:15 Panel Discussion - Legal advice for teachers
5:15 pm Break
for Dinner
Registrants
may purchase tickets in advance for a buffet dinner
in the Student Union Building or make their own
dinner reservations.
7:15 pm
Third Annual Wedge Award and Introduction
Jack
Cashill, PhD
7:30 pm
Science Stumbles on Design
Michael
Behe, PhD
8:50 pm
The
State of the Science: Is ID Making a Genuine Contribution
to Science?"
William
Dembski, PhD
Lobbyfest: Meet
our guest speakers in the lobby.
Top
CONCURRENT
SESSIONS: Each of the Presentations Listed
below, will be given concurrently in two sessions. The
first session will be between 10:30 and 11:30
and the second between 12:45 and 1:45 pm. The
sessions will be held in class rooms at the locations
shown in the program that will be distributed.
Concurrent
Sessions
John
Bracht, MS
Convergence:
a biological enigma
Biological
convergence is widespread and in some cases almost
eerie in its perfection. What does convergence, from
the molecular level to the ecosystem level, suggest
about design? Does convergence demonstrate ideas originating
in the mind of a designer, or does it suggest that
strong selective pressures shaping organisms in similar
ways? While designers are adept at re-using designs,
they may also engineer completely novel solutions to
similar problems. Does convergence really fit better
with an intelligent design viewpoint, or is it challenging
for both Darwinian theory and design theory to adequately
accommodate? I will briefly look at examples of biological
convergence and the potential problems posed for both
Darwinian theory and intelligent design, and why this
issue is worth grappling with intellectually.
Casey
Luskin, MS
First
Concurrent Session:
The New Wave on Campus - Intelligent design clubs on
college campuses
around the country are opening minds
and challenging tradition.
Intelligent
Design and Evolution Awareness (IDEA) Clubs" have
evolved from a small student group at UC San Diego
to a growing network of clubs on university and high
school campuses around the U.S. and abroad. IDEA Clubs
aim to create a venue of friendly,
informed, and informal cooperative inquiry among people
of many beliefs into the scientific and philosophical
issues surrounding intelligent design and evolution.
A primary benefit of this tolerant and bridge-building
approach is to inform students about the often overlooked
evidence supporting intelligent design theory and challenging
evolutionary theory. This talk will inform students
about how they can start an IDEA Club, and address
the recently controversial question of the extent to
which IDEA Clubs are "religious."
Second
Concurrent Session:
Paleomagnetism and the Privileged
Planet:
The "Privileged Planet" hypothesis
states that universe appears designed not only for intelligent
life, but similarly situated to allow for scientific
discovery. In essence, it states that measurability
correlates with habitability. Earth's magnetic field
protects life from solar radiation and is vital to
the continued existence of life on earth. The field
has also contributed to scientific discoveries ranging
from the discovery that continents move to the discovery
of the continents themselves. But does it support the "Privileged
Planet" hypothesis?
This talk will briefly look at how the Earth's magnetic
field protects life, and investigate the extent to
which its properties are rare, and the extent to
which they correlate with scientific discovery.
Methodological
Naturalism and the Integrity of Science
This session
will focus on the principle of methodological naturalism
(MN) and how it impacts the origins debate. We will
consider different definitions that have been used,
and the relation between methodological and metaphysical
naturalism. We will look at how MN affects the way
theories are formulated and how knowledge in the historical
sciences is communicated to the public. We will discuss
the major arguments for adhering to MN and the counterarguments.
We will also discuss the ways that scientific integrity
can be violated when MN is adopted as well as when
it is not adopted. Attendees should leave with a deeper
understanding of why this subject generates such controversy,
and some key questions that our society must face in
dealing with questions regarding the nature of reality.
Harold
Delaney, PhD
Darwinism,
Design, and Academic
Freedom
The case of
Texas Tech biology professor Michael Dini is one recent
example of how beliefs regarding origins raise issues
regarding the academic freedom of professors and students.
One of the screening devices Professor Dini used for
deciding which students he would consider recommending
for graduate education in the biomedical sciences was
the question "How do you think the human species
originated?". The resolution of this case and
others will be reviewed.
Rev. Curtis L. Brickley, Jr.
Presupposing
Naturalism: Atheism, Agnosticism and Theistic Evolution?
Theistic
evolution fails traditional theistic religion by not
allowing for the continued intervention
of a creative cause or power. Theistic evolution
can get
you knowledge "of God" only through faith
by denying natural revelation. But without natural
revelation, there can be no rational basis for
belief in a God who actually reveals Himself through
nature.
By embracing Naturalism, and its rejection of the
supernatural, theistic evolution denies a rational
basis for belief
in God and a basis for our faith in the resurrection
of Jesus Christ.
Science
Education in Public Schools:
Rebecca
Keller, PhD
Science
in the classroom - What do we teach the children?
This
session will address the pressing need to define
the elements of good science education. Questions
such as "What is science?" What is education?" "What
does scientific literacy mean?" "What is responsible
science education?" will be discussed. By addressing
these questions and others, the definition of good
science education will hopefully be better defined
in the minds of educators and scientists alike.
Michael
Keas, PhD
Teach
the Controversy: A Guide to New and Future Curricula
Michael
Keas, PhD, Senior Fellow of Discovery Institute,
Associate Pro fessor of Natural Science, Oklahoma
Baptist University
I will train teachers how to use a new "Icons of Evolution" student
study guide (ColdWater Media, 2004) and preview curriculum
to be publishe d in 2005. Then, we will brainstorm the
sort of future curricula that is nee ded to empower science
educators to more effectively teach about important c ontroversies
in the physical and life sciences. For example, where does
the new "Privileged Planet" and "Biological
Convergence" sci entific data fit into middle
school and high school science instruction?
Michael
Edenburn, MS
Workshops on Origins for Science
Teachers
On May
1, 2004 IDnet-NM conducted a workshop for public school
science teachers to discuss how the new science
education standards impact the teaching of origins
and to discuss the competing views on origins. These
workshops offer an extraordinary opportunity for planting
the principles of objective evidence-based science
education in public schools throughout the country.
We will summarize what we learned from the workshop
and solicit ideas from participants on how to conduct
more effective workshops. This session is especially
intended for those who would like to help plan or participate
in future workshops.
Rick
Cole, MS
Expanding
and Empowering Student Inquiry: A Science Teacher's
Experience and Perspectives on the Teaching
of Origin's Science
Presentation
Summary: Contrasting theories of the origins of life
have
been, are and can be
successfully taught in a public-school, standards-based
curriculum. Methods of research, preparation, instruction,
assessment
and accountability are discussed. Administrative support,
parental notification and pedagogy are key points
of emphasis. Student achievement in this
curriculum includes the ability to think critically
and independent of dogmatic ideologies.
Joseph
Renick, MS
Standards
for State Science Education Standards
Science
Standards must not only be written to reflect grade-appropriate
pedagogical principles, they must also reflect
a high standard of scientific and academic integrity. A
commitment to these two simple ideals will produce
Science Standards that serve the best interest
of science students while avoiding ideological
bias such as promoted by the National Science Education
Standards.
Dave
Thomas, MS
"The
Opposing View: Ten Top Reasons Why ID Should
not be Taught in the Science Classroom"
In
this talk, the Top 10 Myths behind the Intelligent
Design movement will be discussed. Mr. Thomas
will explain why these arguments haven't convinced
mainstream scientists, and why Intelligent Design
is inappropriate for presentation in public school
science classes.
Top
|
|
| |
|
|